To the left is a copy of an "ORDER" (06-SA-64, . . . ) that appears to be crafted directly from Chapter 9 of Ashley S. Lipson's training manual for attorneys, Guerrilla Discovery. (For the definition of Guerrilla, click here.) The order was imposed by Lackawanna County (PA) Court of Common Pleas Judge, Barrasse inconsistent with the Court of Common Pleas Local Rules 128 and 130, and without showing "good cause" with regard to its "relevance" to the "controversy" before him. It is apparent that Judge Barrasse had not considered section 9.54 of Lipson's manual wherein it lists 16 grounds for "Objecting to the Examination" and includes Justice Douglas' landmark decision in Schlagenhauf v. Holder, i.e.; "And a doctor for a fee can easily discover something wrong with any patient . . . ".
Rather than simply stating the validity of the remaining six (6) charges that were predicated on the primary charges previously acquitted by Judge Geroulo on August 31, 2006 (see "ORDER" 06 S 64 to the right), Judge Barrasse had me imprisoned for four (4) days in the Lackawanna County Prison and on 7/8/2008 Judge Barrasse waived the fines and costs that was always within his power to waive, and on 1/13/2009, in a stealth move, simply swept the whole matter "under the rug" by falsifying the records with a "Penalty Satisfied" so that the casual observer would presume that I had participated in his decision. (See Trezevant v. City of Tampa 741 F.2d 336.)
Like Judges Sean McGraw and Vito Geroulo, Judge Barrasse (again) ignored both lawful and legal basic rules of procedure to examine the substantive evidence presented and require statutory claim to the contrary. By way of a Petition for Review I ask(ed) only that the court render right ruling consistent with the Oath of Office that they and their predecessors had taken. Offset of each charge is - and has been - conditioned upon substantive statutory proof of the validity of each of the instant claims.
It is becoming increasingly evident that the United States' and its governments have become occupied by a power foreign to the American People. Absent any proof to the contrary, I have come to believe that members of the Democrat and Republican parties are duty bound to legislate 13th Amendment 'voluntary servitude' on behalf of the owners of the Federal Reserve. The laws that they make are promulgated to 'duly convict of crime' any American who chooses not to volunteer their property and labor into the jurisdiction of this oligarchy of plutocrats.
So I ask:1. Because a duly authorized Title 4 U.S.C., Section 1, 2, 3 American Flag - the flag to which I pledged my allegiance - was captured and not returned by City of Wilkes-Barre (PA) police on February 24, 2005 and City of Carbondale police on February 1, 2006; Are municipal police officers violating their oaths of office when they willfully collude with the seditious guerrilla activities of a belligerent occupying power? Or, Are municipal officers/agents "in fact" the willing hirelings of a belligerent occupying power? Is the prison system in the U.S. essentially a gulag?
2. Because each and every Federal Reserve note is 'debt based' and conditional upon the 'good faith and credit of the American People' (including me); How can any American be compelled to pay an alleged "debt" with a Federal Reserve created 'debt instrument' to which they, the American People, themselves are the Creditor, i.e., the "holder in due course"? Have judges acquiesced to legislated doublespeak (and peer pressure) that was designed to entrap American men and women into statutory "peonage" in which, if they do not comply voluntarily, they can be held "in contempt of court" and condemned to debtors prison?
3. Is there no judge or legislator who will 'stand in the gap' on behalf of an American who, as a matter of conscious, refuses to acquiesce his or her property and/or labor to a foreign power? Or, have all become puppets of a belligerent occupying power?

This is about a Simpson, Pennsylvania businessman of Slovak descent, John B. Drob. Drob had voluntarily entered into American Citizenship because he believed America to be a nation whose government was defined by uncomplicated constitutional law that instituted its governments to provide for the protection and defense of his unalienable Right to Life, Liberty and property. The document, pictured to the left, is a page from a pre-1913 pamphlet from which Drob learned about America's "supreme law of the land". The law upon which Drob relied in anticipation that "judges in every state shall be bound thereby" as they thoughtfully adjudicate justiciable controversies.
In April, most likely the week ending on Saturday, the 10th, 1937 Drob turned to the Lackawanna County court to redress a grievance. (It was reported by his family and friends that Drob had been severely beaten about the head, neck and shoulders by State Troopers, agents of the Department of Revenue, when they came to the businesses on his homestead to confiscate any gold that might be found in his possession. The confiscation was legislated under Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt's administration as part of his "New Deal" for the plutocratic oligarchy who put him and his congress in office.) Drob who had commitments that included his wife, five young children, the Mozart Band, grocery store, saloon, boarding house, and gas station, had no assessed fines, nevertheless, upon giving his plea to the court, he was sentenced to 3 months in jail without bail.
Not many days after his sentencing, a The Scranton Times, (April 20, 1937, page 3, second column), article "COMMISSION TO TEST SANITY OF PRISONER AT COUNTY JAIL" read:
"Upon petition of Warden Gomer C. Davis, of the county jail, court today appointed a commission to inquire into the sanity of John Drop, serving a three-month sentence for violation of the liquor laws. The commission is made up of Drs. Francis Reddington and Charles LaBella and Attorney Pearson S. Judd."
While Drob was still in the Lackawanna County jail, a jailer, concerned for his safety, reported to his wife that the beatings continued. Drob was examined to see if he was insane and, consistent with Justice Douglas' landmark decision in Schlagenhauf v. Holder (379 U.S. 104 (1964)), "a doctor for a fee" found Drob to be so.
From the Lackawanna County jail, Drob was transported to Hillside Home in Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania where he resided until his death at age 58 on August 16, 1950.
Further evidence is available to show that Drob was a stockholder in the Simpson State Bank (incorporated on December 10, 1924 under the provisions of the Act of May 13, 1876, P.L. 161). He believed fervently in an "American dream" that was based on hard work, truth and integrity.
Instead of being rewarded for his entrepreneurial accomplishments in the dejure "free enterprise" system that made America great, Drob and his family became the prime target of criminal activity on the part of an organized and extensive group of people whose business-as-usual pattern of racketeering appeared to include hirelings at every level of society, including the judiciary and elected Pennsylvania government officials.
Ex-post facto liability for "several amendments and supplements . . . as well as the Banking Code of 1923 . . . and . . . the Department of Banking Code of 1933" was levied by LUTHER A HARR, Secretary of Banking of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Receiver of Simpson State Bank, Simpson, Pa. On February 21, 1936, assessment against Drob (and other community minded stockholders) were to be paid to Jerome P. Casey, then Deputy Receiver, at his office, 434 Lackawanna Avenue, Scranton, Pennsylvania. Counsel for Luther A. Harr was; Edward J. Kelly, Frank M. Walsh, and Ellis Berger.
Additionally, Oil stocks were reported to have "disappeared" from Drob's safety deposit boxes at the Miners and Mechanics Bank in Carbondale at its closure in 1931. The controlling shareholders of Miners and Mechanics Bank were reported to be James Paul (64%), Paul's brother George H. Paul, John H. Reese (10%), the Hendricks Estate, (represented by L. A. Bassett, President, and W. T. Colville), and other directors and Carbondale "pioneer families". Other principals of that bank are listed in newspapers in local ads from that era and include Vice President, W. W. Watt, Claude Olver, Frazier W. Lathrope, J. J. O'Neill, R. W. Powell, J. H. Reese, W. G. Scurry, and J. J. Simpson. In fact, on the upper portion of page 3 of the aforementioned April 20, 1937 Scranton Times, there are images of members of the District Attorney's Office Bowling League who were honored at the league's first banquet in the Elks' Club. Those pictured were; James Simon Frutchey, Attorney "Jim" Powell, Joseph Del Vecchio, Joe F. Gilroy, District Attorney, M. J. Eagen, "Joe" Mitchell, "Art" (Jitty) McCann, Justus Englehardt, Sheriff "Ed" J. Coleman, Harry Roth ("Ajax" of the "D.A." office team), Donald McAndrew, Wm. V. (Bill) Murphy, Peckville Station State Police, Billy Barton, Jimmy Kenney, Ed Harris, Andy Burke, "Big Tom" Flannelly, Thomas (Finners) Quinlan, Joe (Splits Prize) Connors, John Kent Orator, Dave (Wimpy) Jones, Bill Newcomb, and Squire, J. M. Munley "Big Noise on D.A.'s Team".
(Click on "Munley" to link to the August 21, 2008 Pa. Courts Pursuing Conciliation for Foreclosures by Amaris Elliott-Engel at Pennsylvania Law Weekly to see how the legislative Casey and judicial Munley liaisons continue to promulgate and adjudicate protections and defenses for owners of global banks and, now, the controversial NGO, "ACORN".)
John B. Drob was my grandfather, and he, like many others in this blessed nation then and now, believed that "All courts shall be open; and every man for an injury done him in his lands, goods, person or reputation shall have remedy by due course of law, and right and justice administered without sale, denial or delay . . . ". Like my grandfather, John B. Drob, I have learned that, in the courts of Lackawanna County, "remedy by due course of law, and right and justice administered without sale, denial or delay" is not an acceptable method for resolving a controversy brought before it. Granted in 1937 the Myers Briggs had not been developed and little was known about TBI (traumatic brain injury), but that does not excuse blatant judicial contempt for the supreme law of the land, Warden Davis' failure to supervise his staff, and the commissions' lack of comity to one not their own and willingness to place blame on the victim rather than the perpetrators. The legal 'circling of the wagons' to protect, rather than correct, wrongful acts has led to a pathological promulgation of laws and legal activity that is now (in my opinion) accurately identified as "legal abuse".
So;
What is the remedy for lack of a remedy?
Who prosecutes the prosecutor?
Who is it that a judge fears when he (or she) adjudicates a controversy about "persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures"?
To whom do American judges pledge their allegiance?
Where is our reparation?
As an adjunct to this post, while I was researching The Scranton Times archives for April 19, 1937, page 16 I found the following article:
FEDERAL RESERVE HIT IN TALK BY LAMNECKWashington, April 19 - Representative Lamneck (D Ohio) told the house today the federal reserve system is committing legally "the greatest burglary in history."
Critizing the system in the midst of a plea that the budget be balanced to avert "calamity," the Ohioan said that for a $300 investment a bank could get a $30,000 return.
"If a burglar had a license to steal, he said, "he would at least have to carry away his loot. The federal reserve system has its loot brought to it."
Lamneck said this was a procedure for a "steal" authorized by congress.
The treasury asks bids for several million dollars worth of bonds. A banker says he will take a million dollars worth and credits the treasury on his books with a million dollars.
Then he deposits the bonds with a federal reserve agent as collateral security for a million dollars in federal reserve notes and agrees to pay the cost of printing the currency - about $300. He now has a million dollars in currency to balance the million dollar deposit he credited to the treasury.
He still owns the bonds and can collect the interest, about $20,000 a year on an investment of $300.
To the right, is the 2002 letterhead acknowledging contributors to, and investors in, the education of our youth during United Nations Day celebrations in Northeastern Pennsylvania. If you live in the Scranton area, you will readily recognize the influence that this global "non-profit" organization has had on our local socio-economic policies as their members tirelessly strive to organize and implement "foreign policy" to build "public support for constructive U.S. leadership in a more effective United Nations".
Upon the death of William P. Rinaldi, Clerk of Judicial Records, Lackawanna County, his wife, Mary Ferrario Rinaldi, Federation of Democratic Women, assumed his position as Clerk of Judicial Records.
Maybe it's time to take another look at "9-11" and what our concerned founders had to say about "divers ill disposed persons" who would attempt to "erect any new government within this commonwealth". Perhaps even consider what Form of government has the United States.
(For more of Carl Klang's musical videos click on MASTER VIDEO LIST .)
Watch Hazleton!
Hazleton's mayor, Lou Barletta's well meaning ordinance requires local government employees to screen applicants for "valid documentation" on behalf of local landlords. Ask yourself; Could Mayor Barletta's ordinance be getting this kind of political attention to create a public demand for a globally documented "citizen" that will make criminals of Americans who choose not to participate? What about you?
When you buy or sell, Which type of documentation will you find most acceptable?
************
Watch for the movie FREEDOM TO FASCISM when it opens in a theatre near you.
************
Institutionalize vigilance with the "We The People Congress" as Bob Schulz addresses the Right to Petition.
Work with Hagan Smith and the Constitution Party of Pennsylvania to restore the Council of Censors in Pennsylvania.





Government Is Foreclosed from Parity with Real People
Supreme Court of the United States 1795
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed . 57; 3 Dall. 54), Supreme Court of the United States
To understand fully the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th Articles of Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America, one might study for hours and hours the case of, U.S. v James Daniel Good Real Property, 114 S. Ct. 492, 496m 505D (1993).
It is now well settled that there is no judicial remedy in favor of an individual against a state to compel the performance of a contract, though it is settled that a state can pass no law impairing the obligation of a contract once made (18 Murry v Charleston, 96 U.S. 432 is an instructive case on this subject).
"There is no such thing as power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it; All else is withheld." Jillird v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421.
"As in the case of illegal arrests, the officer is bound to know these fundamental rights and priveliges, and must keep within the law at his peril." Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 231 14N.W. (2d) 400 (1944)
"The innocent individual who is harmed by an abuse of governmental authority is assured that he will be compensated for his injury." Owens v. City of Independence,
100 S.Ct 1398 (1980)
Failure to obey the command of a police officer constitutes a traditional form of breach of the peace. Obviously, however, one cannot be punished for failing to obey the command of an officer if the command itself is violative of the constitution." Wright v. Georgia 373 US 284
"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional rights." Sherar v. Cullen 481 F. 946
A plaintiff who seeks damages for violation of constitutional or statutory rights may overcome the defendant official's qualified immunity only by showing that those rights were clearly established at the time of the conduct at issue." Davis v. Scherer, 82 L.Ed.2d 139,151.
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." -- Norton vs. Shelby County,
118, US 425 p. 442
--
"It is not the function of our government to keep the Citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the Citizen to keep the government from falling into error." American Communications Ass'n v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 442.
"Government is not reason. Government is not eloquence. It is force, and like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful Master" --George Washington
No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it.
Courts of justice are established, not only to decide upon the controverted rights of the citizens as against each other, but also upon rights in controversy between them and the government.
Under our system the people . . . are the sovereign.
Justice Samuel F. Miller
Supreme Court of the United States
United States v. Lee 1882
- NOTICE AND DEMAND -
Pertaining to the Public Fraud, Law, Money and Commercial Liens
To Whom These Presents Shall Come; Greetings; Take Notice:
1. That, prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court Decisions were based upon what is termed: "Public Law" or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional limitation. After 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court Decisions are based on "Public Policy" concerning commercial transactions made under the "Negotiable Instrument Law," as a result of the U.S. Bankruptcy as declared by President Roosevelt on March 9, 1933 and codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95a. and by Executive Orders. This bankruptcy caused the change from "Public Law" to "Private Commercial Law" and was recognized by the Supreme Court in Erie v. Tompkins, (1938). After that case, all the procedures of Law were officially blended with procedures of Equity.
2. That, the Negotiable Instruments Law is a branch of the "International Law Merchant," which is now known as the "Uniform Commercial Code," (UCC) that was 'drafted' and made uniform, and "adopted in whole or substantially by all states." Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition - page 1531. Thus the several states were and are bound into commercial agreements to the federal United States under the Uniform Commercial Code.
3. That, the several (now 50) States accepted the "benefits" of federal grants offered by the Federal United States as the "consideration" of a commercial agreement between themselves. Under the agreement the States (Conference of Governors, March 6, 1933) pledged their full faith and credit and agreed to obey the dictates of Congress, and assume their portion of the National Debt, collected as "your fair share," as an example, in the nature of the unlawful income tax, wherein the IRS operates and collects such 'taxes' under the same UCC.
4. That, this system of Negotiable paper has bound all corporate entities (cities, municipalities, counties, etc.) of government together to the process/system of the Commercial Venue of Commercial Law as expressed and exercised within the Commercial Lien Process. This nationwide Commercial "bond" also altered the original (law) status of the Courts to nothing more than "administrative tribunals" merely administering the bankruptcy (private policy) of debt collection for the Creditors.
5. That, by and through the bankruptcy, the UCC, and other acts, Congress in failing to uphold its constitutional duty to provide a lawful medium of exchange (i.e., "money" backed by silver and gold, or minted coin pursuant to Article 1, section 8, clause 5) have by these various "Acts" created an abundance of this new type of money called commercial credit money to circulate within the Legislative democracy called the United States...of which "they" are not bound by Constitutional law and limitation.
6. That, the Commercial Law Venue, compelled upon the people a forced "benefit" of "limited liability for the payment of debt" by the "use" of federal reserve notes (debt instruments) wherein "YOUR" debts are only discharged, (not paid) in the form of interest-bearing negotiable instruments (federal reserve notes). "There is a distinction between a debt discharged and one paid. When discharged the debt still exists, though divested of its character as a legal obligation.." Stanek v. White, 215 NWR 781 (1927). Federal reserve notes are only evidence of debt owed to the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Reserve Notes are a commercial lien on the Federal Reserve Bank.
7. That, since 1933, by the acts of the Bankruptcy and the UCC, the Law has been tainted, or "colored," (i.e., color of law) as it were, because the commercial law is operated in conjunction with the Negotiable Instruments Law, wherein the Federal Government by and through the Bankers, can/have declared that a 'piece of paper' has and represents value. Albeit that there is no substance (gold or silver) backing the 'piece of paper,' which the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago in it's publication "Modern Money Mechanics," page 3, has in fact declared the use of these debt instruments (federal reserve notes) a "confidence" game. The substance of the Law (property) (i.e., gold, silver, etc.) has been removed, like the substance that is the basis of money, accordingly, LAW like MONEY becomes a fiction, make-believe! Therefore, in the U.S.A., by and through the UCC, all contracts, agreements, (implied, or otherwise, etc.), applications, permits, etc. where the "colorable" consideration (federal reserve notes) was passed in those 'contracts,' etc., all such contracts are then also "colored" and are not genuine, for no lawful consideration (gold or silver) was paid by either party to the contract to, by Law, pass both the "possession and the property" to the lawful Buyer. See - Bouvier's Dict. of Law, 1839, "TITLE," definition #5. "The lawful coin of the United States will pass the property along with the possession."
8. That, today, all our "courts" (sic) sit as Non-Constitutional-Non-Article III-Legislative Tribunals administering the bankruptcy through 'their' statutes which are in reality "commercial obligations" for the BENEFIT OR PRIVILEGE OF DISCHARGING YOUR DEBTS WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE MONOPOLY COLORABLE' MONEY
NOTES!
9. That, under the current "colorable" legal system, the de-facto (we just do it) legislature has created "colorable" rights called privileges, imposes duties, lays down rules of conduct, and the legislative tribunals declare the same as "rights." These privileges are granted and given upon the peoples' voluntary act of asking "permission," then upon providing any colorable consideration (payment = discharge) the people then come under the administrative jurisdiction of Commercial Law.
10. That, today, in AMERICA, everyone, all governments included, are statutory law merchants dealing in negotiable paper (instruments) under the UCC for the limited liability for the discharge of debts, wherein a debt remains (fraud) and nothing else! The so-called "judges" are operating only a commercial tribunal to administer their "corporate" regulations concerning all financial transactions...both voluntary and those compelled.
11. That, ALL DEBTS are satisfied by one or both of two ways, a payment, or a promise to pay. Every payment is by substance, and every promise to pay is accomplished by a currency or paper which is technically known as commercial lien. The satisfaction of the debt by providing substance is called "paying the debt." The satisfaction of the debt by a written or printed promise to pay the debt is called "discharging the debt." All debts are "paid" by substance. All debts are only "discharged" by CURRENCY, POCKET MONEY NOTES, OR OTHER COMMERCIAL LIENS ( Negotiable Instruments, i.e., Commercial Lien Security/Asset, i.e., UCC 1 Asset).
12. That, all paper money consists of NOTES which declare a debt or obligation and which promise or demand payment. All such evidences of debt or obligations are technically known as COMMERCIAL LIENS. Such 'notes' includes currency, for example, federal reserve notes, checks, drafts, conditional checks, notes of exchange (paper money/instruments between banks).
13. That, a Federal Reserve note is a commercial lien on the Federal Reserve Bank. A personal check is a commercial lien on the bank account of the maker of the check (cheque). A draft is a check (cheque) with a conditional agreement printed above the place of endorsement on the backside of the draft. A "note" of exchange is a commercial lien between the banks consisting of one bank demanding payment (discharge) from another bank. A personal check (cheque), while passing between banks, as a note of exchange, is a commercial lien.
14. That, bank accounts are backed (supported) either by substance money or by paper money, or by both. The substance money is called collateral. The paper money can be currency (for example, paper money notes), a loan of credit from the bank, or checks or other paper money as such, are commercial liens, received from other sources. Therefore the "property" declared/pledged or claimed to secure the obligation, and damages, is the collateral by and through the Commercial Lien process, which establishes (creates) the credit called commercial credit money.
15. That, valid "credit" currency (commercial lien) can be established by making a valid claim of debt (based on a damage or injury) by an affidavit in the form of a 'private security agreement' (and other related documents) and by allowing the lien to mature in three (3) months (90 days) into an accounts receivable (under commercial law) by the failure of the lien debtor to contest the 'agreement/lien' by answering or rebutting, by his affidavit, on a point for point basis.
16. That, a lien must contain 1) the names of the party/parties, claimants, and debtors. 2) an affidavit stating the events which created the obligation. 3) a ledger giving a one-to one correspondence between events and their values. 4) a list of property pledged or claimed to secure the payment (discharge) of the obligation, and 5) any evidence or exhibits in support of the claims made against the debtor.
17. That, the primary method of establishing a COMMERCIAL LIEN currency/paper/ negotiable instrument is to combine, 1) a promise to perform. 2) a claim of breach/damage /injury/fraud, etc., and 3) a three month (90 day) default to challenge or rebut the claim/lien on said point for point basis.
18. That, Commercial Lien/value/currency can be in the form of a bank check (cheque), a draft, a UCC 1 Security, and its partial assignments... that pass, and are accepted, or circulate 'as' credit money.
19. Therefore, the "people," operating in their private capacity, by and through the remedy provided in the Uniform Commercial Code, pursuant to their collective sovereign capacity, upon injury or damage, may as a matter of right, proceed to utilize the Commercial Law venue against the agents of governments, their creations (corporations) and its officers (accountability = liability) to arrive at the truth and secure damages by the Commercial Lien process (to create & establish the damages in the form of UCC "money," i.e., a security, an asset, and liability) supported by the full faith and credit of the United States Federal Government under the Commercial Law and the UCC... America's Federal (and State) Common Law.
20. That, in the Commercial Venue, TRUTH is sovereign, and the sovereign must always tell the TRUTH.
CAVEAT
Upon receipt of this Memorandum of Points and Authorities - Notice and Demand, to the intended party, by Certified Mail, as either a 'Public Servant' who by "Oath of Office" or duty as an "Officer" of a government created corporation, municipality, etc., and/or by and through your "superior knowledge of the law," you have 15 days to review and correct any errors within the Memorandum and respond by Certified, U.S. Mail as to any corrections to the enumerated points herein. Failure to do so within the 15 days, allowing up to three days grace for mail delivery, will place you and your office in default, and the presumption will be taken upon the public record that you and your office fully agrees to the points and authorities contained within this Memorandum and that they are true, correct and certain. (F.R.C.P. 8d)
Notice to Principal is Notice to agent and Notice to agent is Notice to Principal.
Certified Mail Receipt No._____________________
Dated this _____day of _______________, 1999
Respectfully:
_______________________________________, Sui Juris
Mailing Location:
(Author unknown)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------